Transformations of
Coordinate transformations let us view or discuss the plane
or space in a different way. A 2d transformation tells us how to transform a axes into an
axes—the two outputs of are considered the
and coordinates corresponding to the inputs and .
In the previous problem, you saw how we can think of 2D
transformations as mapping the points of one plane onto another.
Another way of thinking about transformations is to view them as
giving additional coordinates to points on the plane, i.e., if
, then the point also can be called
the point in the coordinate system associated with . The next problem investigates this way of thinking about
transformations.
See Larson 10.4.
The transformation is called the
polar
coordinate transformation. We will use this transformation to
answer the following questions.
- . What is ? Draw the vector
on the axes, starting at the origin.
- Show that the length of the vector is 2. This is
the “radius” of the point .
- Show that the angle between the positive -axis and the
vector is . This angle is called the azimuth
angle.
- Show that if , then the
“radius” of the point is .
- Show that if , then the azimuth
angle of the vector is .
Sometimes a transformation may associate multiple coordinates
with the same point on the plane. In this problem,
again use the polar coordinate transform . Find 5 different so
that (each of these is a
different set of polar coordinates for the same point
). Make at least one of your
coordinates have a negative , and at least one have a
negative .
Consider the coordinate transformation
-
Let ; graph the curve for
.
-
Use Sage to check your answer.
Let and then, on the same
axes as above, add the graph of for .
-
Use Sage to check your answer.
To the same axes as above, add the graphs of for
and for .
[Hint: when you're done, you should have a bunch of
parabolas and ellipses.]
Transformations of
In 3 dimensions, the most common coordinate systems are
cylindrical and spherical. The equations for these coordinate
systems are:
- Cylindrical Coordinates:
- Spherical Coordinates:
\marginparbmw{See page 893.}
See Larson 11.7.
Let be a point in space. This point lies on a
cylinder of radius , where the cylinder has the axis as
its axis of symmetry. The height of the point is units up
from the plane. The point casts a shadow in the plane
at . The angle between the ray and the
-axis is .

- Explain why , , and
.
- What are bounds on , , and that will give
all points on the surface of a cylinder of radius 1 wrapped
around the axis between the plane and ? [Hint:
the bounds on are .]
- What are bounds on , , and that will give
all points inside a solid cylinder of radius 2 wrapped around
the -axis extending from 1 unit below the plane to 1
unit above the plane?
\marginparbmw{See page 897.}
See Larson 11.7.
Let be
a point in space. This point lies on a sphere of radius
(“rho”), where the sphere's center is at the
origin . The point casts a shadow in the plane
at . The angle between the ray and the
-axis is , and is called the azimuth angle. The
angle between the ray and the axis is
("phi"), and is called the inclination angle,
polar angle, or zenith angle.

- Explain why ,
, and .
- What are bounds for , , and that
will give all the points on the surface a sphere of radius 1?
[Hint: the bounds for are .]
- What are bounds on , , and that will
give all the points on or above the plane inside a solid
sphere of radius 1?
- What are bounds on , , and that will
give all the points on the surface of a sphere of radius 2
above the plane and where the coordinates are
positive?
There is some disagreement between different fields about
the notation for spherical coordinates. In some fields (like
physics), represents the azimuth angle and
represents the inclination angle. In some fields, like geography,
instead of the inclination angle, the elevation angle is
given—the angle from the -plane (for example, lines of lattitude are
from the elevation angle). Additionally, sometimes the
coordinates are written in a different order. You should always
check the notation for spherical coordinates before communicating
using them.
See Larson 11.7:89–94,
111–114.
Consider the spherical coordinates transformation
Graphing this transformation requires dimensions. In
this problem we'll construct parts of this graph by graphing
various surfaces. We did something similar for the polar
coordinate transformation already in
this problem.
-
Graph the surface (in other
words, the surface ) where ,
.
-
Graph for ,
(in other words, all points where
). What happens if can be negative
(i.e., )?
- Graph for ,
(in other words, all points where
).
- Graph for , (in other words, all points where
).
Transformation Functions and Parametric Surfaces
We saw in this problem that if we make one of the input variables a constant in a transformation function, we get a surface. We can use this idea to find parametric equations for a given surface.
For example, in a problem above, was the spherical coordinate transformation, and we set : to get a sphere of radius 2. Since we were eliminating one of the input variables by setting it to be a number, we could have written this same function as . This function is then a parametric equation for a sphere of radius 2.
Use
Sage or
Wolfram
Alpha
to plot your parametrization.
See 16.5:
1-16 for more practice.
See Larson 15.5:21–30 and 15.5,
Example 3.
Consider the surface plotted in
this problem. We'll use the rectangular coordinate transformation (this transformation does nothing to 3d space).
- We're trying to find a parametric equation for this surface. If we set the input variable in , we can give a parametrization of the surface. In other words, so that the parametric surface is the surface ? [Hint: Use the surface equation
to eliminate the input variable in .]
- What bounds must you place on and to obtain the
portion of the surface above the plane ?
- If is any surface, give a parametrization of
the surface (i.e., or .)
See 16.5: 1-16 for more practice.
See Larson 15.5:1–10
Recall the spherical coordinate transformation
This is a
function of the form . If we eliminate one of the inputs (for example, if we hold it constant), then we have a function of the form , which is a parametric
surface.
-
Give a parametrization of the sphere of radius 4, . Make sure your bounds on and hit
every point on the sphere.
- Give a parameterization of the part of the sphere of radius 4 that is above the plane . [Hint: the only thing that changes from the previous part is the bounds on and .]
Use
Sage or
Wolfram Alpha to plot
your parametrization with your bounds.
See 16.5: 1-16 for more practice.
See Larson 15.5:1–10
Consider the surface .
- Using cylindrical coordinates, , obtain a parametrization
of the surface using the input
variables and . [Hint: we already know and ; just write in
terms of and .]
- What bounds must you place on and to obtain
the portion of the surface above the plane ?
Sometimes you'll have to invent your own coordinate system
when constructing parametric equations for a surface. If you
notice that there are lots of circles parallel to one of the
coordinate planes, try using a modified version of cylindrical
coordinates. For example, instead of circles in the plane
(), maybe you need circles in
the -plane ().
See Larson 15.5:21–30.
Find a parametric equation for the surface .
[Hint: read the paragraph above.]
-
What bounds on the inputs should you use to obtain the portion of
the surface between and ?
- What bounds on the inputs should you use to obtain the portion of the
surface above ?
- What bounds on the inputs should you use to obtain the portion of the
surface with and ?
Construct a graph of the surface . Do so in 2 ways. (1) Construct a 3D surface plot. (2)
Construct a contour plot, which is a graph with several level
curves. Which level curve passes through the point ? Use
Wolfram Alpha to know if you're right. Just type “plot
z=x\^2-y\^2.”
Construct a plot of the vector field by graphing the field at many integer
points around the origin (I generally like to get the 8 integer
points around the origin, and then a few more). Then explain
how to modify your graph to obtain a plot of the vector field
Polar Coordinates
See Larson section 10.4 and 10.5 for more
reference material on the things we cover in this
section.
In this section, we'll explore polar coordinates a bit more. One of the things to take away from this section is that using a natural coordinate system for your problem can make the problem much simpler.
To construct a graph of a
polar curve, just create an table. Choose values for
that will make it easy to compute any trig functions
involved. Then connect the points in a smooth manner, making sure
that your radius grows or shrinks appropriately as your angle
increases.
See
Sage. Use Sage to check your answers in the other graphing problems too.
See 11.4: 1-20.
Graph the polar curve . This curve is called a
cardiod (see also
here). The Cartesian equation for this curve is . Which is simpler, the polar equation or the Cartesian equation?
Graph the polar curve and identify which points on the curve came from negative values and which came from positive values. This curve is called a
rose (see also
here). The Cartesian equation for this curve is . Which equation is simpler?
Graph the polar curve and identify which points on the curve came from negative values and which came from positive values. This curve is also called a rose. The Cartesian equation for this curve is . Which equation is simpler?
See Larson 10.5:17–26
Find the points of intersection of and
. (If you don't graph the curves, you'll
probably miss a few points of intersection.)
Here's another intersection problem.
Find the points of intersection of and
. (If you don't graph the curves, you'll probably
miss a few points of intersection.)
See 11.3:5-10.
The following points are given using their polar
coordinates. Plot the points in the Cartesian plane, and give
the Cartesian (rectangular) coordinates of each point. The
points are
The next problem provides general formulas for converting
between the Cartesian (rectangular) and polar coordinate systems.
See page 647.
Suppose that is a point in the plane with Cartesian
coordinates and polar coordinates .
- Write formulas for and in terms of and
: ,
- Write a formula to find the distance from to the
origin (in terms of and ):
- Write a formula to find the angle between the
-axis and a line connecting to the origin, in terms of
and : . [Hint: A picture of a triangle
will help here.]
See 11.3: 53-66.
Each of the following equations is written in the
Cartesian (rectangular) coordinate system. Convert each to an
equation in polar coordinates, and then solve for so that
the equation is in the form . Judge which equation is simpler, Cartesian or polar.
See 11.3: 27-52. I strongly suggest that
you do many of these as practice.
Each of the following equations is written in the polar
coordinate system. Convert each to an equation in the Cartesian
coordinates. Judge which equation is simpler, Cartesian or polar.
- [Hint: multiply both sides by .]
Recall that for
parametric curves , to find the slope of
the curve we just compute
A polar curve of the form can be thought of as just
the parametric curve . So you can find the
slope by computing
See 11.2: 1-14.
Consider the polar curve .
- Sketch the curve.
- Compute both and .
- Find the slope of the curve at
.
- Give both a vector equation of the tangent line, and a
Cartesian equation of the tangent line at
.